SBTI 人格测试
SBTI 是 jiligulu 上的趣味人格测试项目,围绕 15 个文化维度、29 种结果类型和中文互联网语境,提供可分享的人格结果与解读。
What it is / 项目是什么
A provocative personality test that roasts you. 31 questions, 15 dimensions, 29 personality types — each one brutally honest. 100K+ tests taken.
一个会骂你的人格测试。31 道题、15 个维度、29 种人格,每一种都不太客气。已有 10 万+ 人完成测试。
How it works / 实现原理
31 道题分布在嘴硬、反骨、自我合理化、情绪压缩、体面阈值等 15 个维度上。每题用 5 级量表打分,题目刻意避免学术化用词,全部使用中文互联网原生的日常场景。后台用阈值规则把维度分数映射到 29 种结果原型之一,再用副维度做语气调色——所以即使两个人结果同名,描述细节也会有差异。结果页只输出一段总结 + 3-5 条具体行为观察 + 推荐阅读,不做长篇心理学讲解。
Who it is for / 适合谁
想用轻松方式观察社交风格、情绪表达和关系模式的用户。
Typical use cases / 常见使用场景
- 朋友群里互相做、互相对照人设
- 社交媒体分享时的轻量话题素材
- 自己想看见某些没注意的行为习惯
Key features / 主要功能
- 31 道题覆盖情绪、防御、社交、自我合理化和行动风格
- 29 种结果类型,适合截图分享和朋友讨论
- 结果页强调娱乐、自我观察和非诊断边界
Design notes / 设计取舍
起源是发现 MBTI、16Personalities 这类工具在中文语境下"措辞太洋气"——很多描述让中文用户觉得隔了一层翻译。SBTI 不是想取代它们,而是想用中文互联网原生的语言重写一套:嘴硬、嘴瓢、自我合理化、暗中观察这些词比 Te/Fi 更直接传达状态。所以它的科学性不和量表竞争,竞争的是语言贴合度和分享价值。
Technology stack / 技术栈
Each layer below was chosen for what it lets the project avoid as much as what it enables. Together they shape the latency, the build pipeline, and how quickly new ideas can be tried in production.
下面这些选择,更多是为了排除某些复杂度,而不只是为了“用上”。它们共同决定了项目的延迟特性、构建流水线,以及把一个想法跑通的最短路径。
React
A component-based JavaScript library for building user interfaces. Used for fast, interactive UI with predictable rendering.
TypeScript
A typed superset of JavaScript that catches mismatches at compile time. Helps keep the codebase maintainable as projects grow.
Tailwind
A utility-first CSS framework that composes styles directly in markup. Keeps visual decisions close to the component and avoids unused CSS bloat.
Framer Motion
A React animation library for declarative motion design. Handles gestures, transitions, and shared-element animations.
FAQ / 常见问题
SBTI 是 MBTI 的中文版吗?
不是。SBTI 的维度和算法完全独立于 MBTI,"BTI"只是为了好记。具体比较见 /blog/mbti-vs-sbti-whats-the-difference。
为什么结果有时让我觉得"被骂了"?
这是有意设计。SBTI 的结果文案保留了一点不客气的语气,目的是让人不轻易把它当成自我夸奖工具。如果某句让你不舒服,建议先观察一下:你最近有没有真的在这样做?
可以在哪里看见结果分享?
结果页提供一键截图布局,许多用户会发到小红书、微博、朋友圈。但本站不收集你的真实身份,分享与否完全由你决定。
测试数据会被收集吗?
不会要求登录,也不绑定身份。具体隐私处理见 /privacy。
More projects from jiligulu
If this project struck a chord, the same hands are behind these. Each one was built to answer a different question — and each one borrows lessons from the rest.
命理问答
A Bazi Q&A assistant built around a local RAG knowledge base, designed for conversational answers from curated astrology and Bazi material.
Read moreCreative image tool拼豆像素图生成器
A pixel-bead pattern generator for turning source images into bead-friendly pixel art references and craft layouts.
Read morePersonal web appMandy 专属治愈站
A personal healing station with 450+ curated quotes, song lyrics, daily challenges, mood tracking, and anniversary counter. Built with love.
Read moreContinue reading
The blog goes deeper into the ideas behind SBTI. These pieces unpack the psychology, the engineering trade-offs, and the design questions this project raises.
- 11 min read
拖延不是懒,是情绪调节问题 / Procrastination Isn't Laziness, It's Emotion Regulation
你拖延某件事的真正原因,几乎从来不是"我懒",而是"做这件事会让我感觉不好"。Pychyl 和 Sirois 这两位拖延心理学家的研究把这事讲得很硬,也带来一组完全不一样的应对方法。/ The real reason you procrastinate on something almost never reduces to "I'm lazy." It's "doing this would make me feel bad." Tim Pychyl and Fuschia Sirois have spent decades demonstrating this — and the implications change what a useful response looks like.
- 10 min read
独处不等于孤独 / Solitude Is Not the Same as Loneliness
中文里"独处"和"孤独"经常被混着用,神经科学和心理学却把它们当成两件几乎相反的事——前者是恢复,后者是消耗。这篇讲一下两者的差别、独处的具体好处,以及为什么现代生活把独处变得越来越难。/ Chinese readers often blur "solitude" and "loneliness"; neuroscience and psychology treat them as nearly opposite phenomena — one restores, the other drains. This piece spells out the difference, what solitude actually does, and why modern life makes it so hard to access.
- 9 min read
你在 GitHub、LinkedIn、Twitter 上是同一个人吗?/ Are You the Same Person on GitHub, LinkedIn, and Twitter?
程序员、设计师、做产品的人——基本上每个互联网工作者,都在三五个平台上有不同程度割裂的"自己"。这种割裂是策略上的成熟,还是身份层面的代价?/ Engineers, designers, product folks — basically everyone who works online maintains some level of fractured self across three or five platforms. Is that fracture strategic maturity, or an identity-level cost?